An old news article still follows your name
NetClearer prepares two requests for an old article about you: one to the publisher, asking it to anonymise, update or stop indexing the page, and one to Google, asking it to delist the result for your name. We use the press rules of your country and EU case law. €29 incl. VAT per link. The publisher and Google decide.
Published · Updated by Pierre Billard, founder of NetClearer
When an article outlives its news value
A local paper wrote about your company’s bankruptcy in 2012. A regional site reported a neighbours’ dispute with your full name. A student newspaper quoted you in a story you now regret. The facts were news once. Years later the article is still the second result for your name, and it shapes every first impression.
Two parties can change that. The publisher controls the page: it can anonymise your name, add an update or tell search engines not to index it. Google controls the search result: it can stop showing the page for searches on your name. We address both, because each route has different rules.
Press archives: what courts and press councils say
Newspapers have a strong right to keep archives. Courts still accept that, after enough time, a private person’s name may be taken out of an old story.
| Where | Rule or case | What it means for you |
|---|---|---|
| All Council of Europe states | *Hurbain v Belgium*, European Court of Human Rights, Grand Chamber, 4 July 2023 (12 votes to 5) | An order to anonymise a 1994 article in an online archive did not breach press freedom (Media Defence) |
| Netherlands | Raad voor de Journalistiek criteria, since 1 May 2021 | After a refused request, you can complain; archives usually prevail, but a grounded reason can justify removal, with extra weight for minors (RvdJ) |
| Denmark | Pressenævnet and press-ethics rule B8 | Media can delist, anonymise or remove; the press board criticises refusals mainly for particularly burdensome information |
| Poland | Supreme Administrative Court (NSA), 2025 | GDPR art. 17 can be a basis to demand removal from digital press archives; UODO cannot refuse automatically (Rynek Zdrowia) |
| Spain | Constitutional Court STC 58/2018 (*El País*) | A newspaper may have to stop its own search tool from finding names in old news; no duty to delete the article |
These rulings help an argument. They do not oblige a given publisher to act. NetClearer is not a law firm and does not give legal advice. For an old article in a French-language newspaper, our French site explains delisting of old press articles.
What we do, step by step
- We read the article and check dates, your role in it, and whether you are or were a public figure.
- You sign a mandate and send ID. We write to the publisher’s editor or data protection officer, the same day you order, asking for the mildest change that solves the problem: anonymisation, an update or a no-index tag.
- In parallel, we file a delisting request with Google for the searches on your name.
- If the publisher refuses, we prepare the complaint to the press council (Raad voor de Journalistiek, Pressenævnet) or to your data protection authority. Where the form must come from you, you sign and send it.
- We report each answer to you.
Who has a good case, and who does not
- Good chances: a private person, a minor at the time, a small or old matter, a story that ended well (charges dropped, debts paid).
- Weaker chances: a politician, a senior manager about the job they still hold, a serious crime, a story from the last few years.
- Not our work: asking a court to order a newspaper to delete an article. For that, consult a lawyer in your country.
Price: €29 incl. VAT per link; the publisher request and the Google request for the same article count as one link. No refund once your request has been filed.
Frequently asked questions
Will the newspaper delete the article?
Rarely. Most publishers prefer to anonymise a name, add an update or stop the page from being indexed. That is usually enough: once your name is gone or the page is no-indexed, the article no longer appears in searches for you. We ask for the mildest change that solves your problem.
The article is about my acquittal, or charges that were dropped. Is that different?
Yes, and it helps. EU case law says search engines must take the current situation into account when a result concerns criminal proceedings. See our page on old conviction and court news, which explains the C-136/17 ruling and the routes for acquittals and spent convictions.
Can complaining make the story come back?
It can happen. A few publishers write about removal requests they receive. We keep requests short, polite and private, and we discuss this risk with you for each news site before we file anything. Sometimes the Google request alone is the safer first step.
I live in Flanders. Which rules apply?
Belgian courts were at the origin of the *Hurbain* case, and Flemish publishers know it. Your complaint route after a refusal is the Belgian data protection authority (GBA). Our Belgium page explains the routes for Dutch-speaking Belgium. Flemish publishers can be written to in clear English.
Reviews of this service
Did you use this service? Share your experience under a pseudonym: your review is published after moderation. Links, email addresses and phone numbers are not accepted.
No review yet for this service.
Related services
Google delisting
Ask Google to stop showing outdated, inaccurate or excessive results for your name, under the EU right to be forgotten. We prepare, file and follow up the request.
Learn moreRemove your name from Google
A practical guide to auditing name-based results, removing pages at their source and requesting Google delisting under European privacy rules.
Learn moreOld conviction or court news
Court reports, convictions, acquittals or dropped charges that still appear for your name: delisting requests based on EU case law and national rules on spent records.
Learn moreBelgium (Flanders)
Dutch-speaking Belgium: old press articles after the Hurbain ruling, fake reviews and review extortion on Google and Kiyoh, and name results on Google.
Learn moreDenmark
Name and address protection with MitID, Krak listings, Trustpilot and Google reviews, old articles and the Press Council: the Danish routes we use.
Learn moreTell us what is happening. We will take it from here.
Free, confidential assessment. Written reply within 24 hours.